Sunday, January 28, 2018

Not as Simple as It Seems

            Hello. I hope everyone’s weekend is going well. I am going to take this time to discuss and reflect on a topic that particularly struck me as interesting and seemingly so obvious, yet it is a topic which most people are not aware of: this would be the topic of simply donating at the right time and to the right organization. When any type of philanthropist, whether it be a child donating the spare change in his piggy bank or a billionaire making a multi-million-dollar contribution, just the feeling of knowing that they are contributing for the greater good and doing something selfless warms their heart with the feeling that they are directly helping a cause greater that their own-or, so they think. Within just the first week of class, something that struck me as so shocking, yet so obvious that I could not believe I did not consider it within my entire life, was the fact that when we blindly donate to a nonprofit organization, it does contribute to a good cause, but often we do not know where and what the money goes toward. As we touched upon the first week of class, if you donate a sizeable amount of money to, say, Feeding America, is your grant going directly toward food for the hungry? Perhaps it is simply going into paying for their electric bill. Maybe there was another organization that could have used the money to aid in a greater cause; one that would have helped to stop hunger altogether, rather than providing temporary relief. These are a few of the many factors we must consider when making a donation of any size to any organization or cause.
            Within discussion in class and personal reflection outside of class, a huge factor which stuck out to me which we do not consider when making a donation, specifically to a disaster relief effort, is the timing of the donation, or, rather, the optimal time to truly make a contribution. For instance, as we discussed in class, there seems to be an economic cycle which follows each and every natural disaster. This cycle begins with a spike in donations immediately following the event as a result of the media featuring the cause on nearly every news station, high-profile online website, and other means of digital influence. Soon after this initial “spike” in donations (approximately 2-3 weeks after the occurrence of the event), however, the media simply moves on to the next big story and a resulting plummet in donations follows; meanwhile, the disaster relief efforts typically carry on for months or sometimes even years. This is the truly optimal time to make a donation in the case of a disaster relief effort. An example of this lies in the relief efforts in response to Hurricane Maria (as we briefly discussed in class). The so-called “initial spike” in donations has long since passed; however, half the island of Puerto Rico is still currently without power. Without the proper capital to fund these relief efforts, the recovery of the island will drastically slow down, and perhaps even stall. It is instances such as the Hurricane Maria relief efforts in Puerto Rico which demonstrate that we must donate with our brains more than our hearts. The correct time to do this varies, but we must donate when donations from others are beginning to decline.
            The amount of common sense we lack as a society in terms of philanthropy startles me. As I stated earlier, the fact that I had never previously thought of any of the topics discussed in class caught me by surprise. The general population should absolutely be more exposed to the topics which we have discussed in class. An online article from cbsnews.com (to which I have attached the link) is something I found particularly interesting. It talks about how-more often than not-it is more helpful to donate cash than an item to disaster relief efforts; sometimes an item can actually enhance the problem. An example of this was in 2004, when an island in Indonesia received so many clothing items in relief of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. The clothing items came in so often and so frequently that officials were forced to leave them to rot on a beach and eventually burn them. This-as stated previously-simply created a new problem and slightly prolonged relief efforts. This idea of there being more than one dimension to philanthropy or, rather, a simple donation to any random nonprofit, is something which I believe the public is not exposed to nearly enough. The average philanthropist should be educated to the topics which we are currently discussing, especially to the idea of Strategic Philanthropy. Before I conclude, I would like for all of you, the readers, to ask yourself these questions whenever you consider making a donation of some kind:
  • Is this a cause which I am passionate about?
  • Did I do my research on this organization/cause?
  • Is this organization/cause trustworthy? Does it have a good reputation?
  • What would my donation be going toward?
  • Is it better to donate to a local nonprofit or rather a large, nationally-known organization?
  • Is it more sensible (in this case) to donate items or capital?
  • Is this truly the organization/cause which will make the most out of my donation? Is there another organization/cause out there in which my grant would be put to better use?
  • How much of a difference would I truly be making if I donated to this organization/cause?
  • Am I donating in tandem with my brain and my heart?

These are all questions we must ask ourselves in order to make as much of a difference as possible. In reflecting on this topic, my hope is that the general population becomes more educated about strategic philanthropy, and the idea that blindly donating to any charity or nonprofit may not be the smartest thing.

Article Links: