A major purpose of this class was to learn how to make a definitive decision.
It can be hard to make a decision, especially when faced with many equally good options.
But through voting on charity pitches, narrowing down issue areas, and ultimately making our
final grantmaking decision, we refined our abilities to be decisive and choose.
Yesterday, during the first round of charity pitches, I made a suggestion that completely ignored this lesson. I was, same as many of you, so conflicted with the decision I had to make - where to cast my vote. I couldn’t make the choice, so concerned that selecting one would validate the personal experience of that one person at the expense of the others. All of the organizations would do good with the money, but, more importantly, all the personal stories of our classmates who pitched them were so moving, so deeply motivated, that it was impossible to choose any one over the other. So I raised my hand and offered the option to not choose. I took the easy way, because 2 extra dollars was a small amount compared to the difficulty of the decision. I don’t regret doing this.
If these three charities had been pitched together earlier in the semester, I could not have offered this option. It would have been too dangerous of a precedent to set -- any hard choice we faced could just be avoided with a few more dollars. It would have undermined the important lesson of objective, definitive decision making that Professor Campbell was working so hard to instill in us.
We’ve made our big decision. No one would say it was easy. The truth is, any one of our finalist organizations would have been an excellent selection to receive our funds -- but that is why it was such a difficult choice. Despite this, we made our decision, and while not every organization that I voted for won, I am satisfied with what we picked, and I would not take it back even if I could.
The way I see it, winning the extra funds from the Learning by Giving Foundation has given us
2 extra dollars. We went through the difficult process of choosing two organizations to receive our grants, we’ve shown that we have learned to be decisive and make a decision. Now we
have the opportunity to help the other charities that we couldn’t help, but we know need it.
That being said, I don’t want to split the $2000 3 ways and give $666.66 each to CHOW, WCC, and the Boys and Girls Club. I’m not convinced that the Boys and Girls Club had as much need as the other organizations, and would benefit as much from a donation of that size. Instead, I am proposing that we split the $2000 in half between CHOW and the Wilson’s Children Center, giving $1000 each towards operating expenses. I believe that $1000 would have the greatest, most far-reaching impact going to CHOW; it would pay for costs associated with the food reclamation program, helping them continue redistributing literally tons of food that would otherwise be wasted. And I believe that a $1000 donation would be immensely appreciated at the Wilson’s Children Center. The site visit showed a tremendous need for money, and because they’re located in Deposit, the WCC doesn’t have the network or exposure that helps organizations like CHOW and the Boys and Girls Club raise adequate funds.
This is all just my opinion, and as the discussion of where to donate extra funds is no longer hypothetical, please continue offering your perspectives in the comments. Lastly, I want to say congratulations and thanks to all of us. The effort and involvement that every single person contributed to this blog is what allowed us to even have this discussion about extra funds in the first place.