Tuesday, April 24, 2018

The Importance of Affirmative Arguments for all of our Applicants

Hi Everyone!

Based off of our recent conversations in class, I have noticed that there seems to be a lot of negative generalizations made about specific organizations that are used to discredit them or support other organizations. Although these generalizations may have some truth to them, they over simplify the complicated nature of the non-profit organizations and may be used to place other organizations in au unfair, better light. Of course, this just stems from the large amount of passion our class has for helping Broome County and donating to what we believe is the "best" organization. However, I believe that this method of persuasion may be unhelpful or counteractive in making a completely informed and objective decision. To try to combat this bias, I thought I might provide some affirmative arguments for all of the organizations and try to clarify or break down certain generalizations that we as a class may be making.

To begin, I'd like to start with the YWCA, as it was our first site visit. The YWCA applied for a program grant that would be funneled into a fund that would either support housing women who are homeless or have lost their home or the Young Wonders program. According to the YWCA's executive director, there seems to be more need or demand for support for the Young Wonders program, so most likely our donation would be allocated towards helping 2 children attend this program. The parents of these children would have to pay for half of the tuition for this program, however, this is a fairly affordable form of childcare available in the county. The fact that only 2 children will be directly helped is definitely a weakness, however, many of the children involved in this program have mothers who also receive help from the YWCA (whether it is in the form of housing, drug addiction, or providing job skills). Yes, the program is expensive, but childcare in general is a costly service, as caring for a child is very demanding and there are numerous regulations the state requires. The program has also shown success as graduates are known to be well behaved when they enter public school.The YWCA charges very little more than what WCC charges. Finally, although the YWCA will be receiving a $1.9 million endowment, it is unclear when this money will come in, changes in wills can and often are made, and the YWCA provides a multitude of expensive services to the community that need to be accounted for. The YWCA is pretty generally well known, however, they do not have a large surplus of income (if at all) at the end of the fiscal year to funnel back into their organizations.

Next, we visited CHOW. CHOW applied for a grant that would cover the costs of a Summer Care Package Program which would provide meals for families over the summer. This is important because many families and children rely on schools to receive at least two meals a day. However, when school closes for the summer, this reliable source of nutrition is taken away. CHOW plans on using our money to feed 30,000 people. Although many view CHOW's work as a "Band-Aid" fix, their distribution of food would reduce stress at home regarding where the next meal would come from and could help create a happier and better experience for families at home. Additionally, their employment program employs various members of the community and provides them with skills to find employment after graduating the program. Although this program is not where our money would go, our money would be able to shift funds so that potentially CHOW could expand on or focus on this program. An impressive 40% of graduates from the program were able to obtain employment in 4 weeks.

Thirdly, we visited the Boys and Girls Club. I think many believe that based off of the condition of the site, well-known and financially wealthy donors, and the established reputation of this organization indicate that this organization is well off and doesn't need our donation. However, in their application for an operating grant, they state that due to large cuts from a variety of sources (including and especially United Way), they have had to close the center down earlier and on school holidays. Any form of a grant could allow this problem to be resolved. The program they applied with was the Teen Summer Employment Program, where 6 teens would be employed over the summer and given job skills and experience. This would boost their confidence, potentially alleviate family stress at home regarding paying bills, and give them the tools to eventually obtain a job and become self-sufficient. This is especially beneficial to the teens who come from underprivileged backgrounds and may have trouble seeing themselves attending college or obtaining a job that pays better than minimum wage.

Next, we visited the Mental Health Association. Their Compeer program would provide youth with trained mentors who serve as role models and a support system for these at risk youth. This program is reliable and has been operating for 5 years with success. Youth may be referred to affordable health care providers and through social events and communication with other members of the program as well as mentors are taught better social skills and ways to manage unhealthy feelings. Some have graduated the program and gone on to college, and the families and schools are heavily involved in this program. One challenge this program may face is that MHAST is having a hard time finding people willing and able to become mentors. Although many college students may show interest, it is hard for students to be mentors as they leave over the summer and the youth need consistent support. However, since our donation will be matched, maybe the organization will use this extra money to hire someone who is an expert in marketing or on advertising the program to the community. It may be unrealistic to say that our donation could help 70 individuals as there is currently a shortage in supply of mentors. However, this could change. The organization also partners with DSS and CPS and ensures that both children and their parents are receiving the necessary help to maintain their mental health. Because of this, I would say this organization and program takes a very wholistic approach to combatting mental health which is definitely an advantage.

Finally, the Wilson's Children Center is an organization that is a great asset to the Deposit community. They provide a service that is in great demand and need, and focus on more than just caring for the children physically. WCC's curriculum integrates both education on social/emotional  health and more common forms of education. The program they applied with was their Anger/Aggression Program. Through this program, the center would buy crash pads and provide the staff with training on how to educate students on how to deal with anger and aggression. They would also learn when anger is appropriate or not. This is beneficial to students coming from home environments that may be stressful or not ideal. Because of these environments, the children may learn inappropriate ways to deal with anger from their parents or develop their own inappropriate techniques to deal with anger as a result of their frustrations from home. This program would teach appropriate strategies to deal with anger, which as the executive director mentioned is a skill even many adults lack. The crash pads would also provide an outlet for aggression. Although the program may seem to lack unity, this does not necessarily mean that WCC is a disorganized organization. Their financial statements show that they have been producing at a deficit the past few years, however, this deficit makes up only 1% of their overall income and has been decreasing in the past few years steadily. This organization has existed as a reliable form of affordable child care, and the lack of unity in this specific potential program should not reflect how disorganized the organization is as a whole. They have a number of other programs they have implemented and maintained and manage to stay afloat in the face of rising minimum wages and decreasing funds.

Overall, I believe all of these organizations are great contenders. Each organization responds to community needs well and has shown some extent of success. One final note I would add is that although many want to focus on the "financial need" of these organizations, none of the organizations are "rich." Furthermore, none of the organizations would struggle to continue operating in the absence of receiving our donations. Of course, all of these organizations would, however, benefit in some way by receiving our grants. This is why I believe financial need of an organization shouldn't be a deciding factor in who should ultimately receive our donation(s).
Please let me know what you think of all of this, and if you have any additional comments or questions regarding my post! Thanks for reading!

5 comments:

  1. Allyson,


    Thank-you for posting this! I definitely agree with what you are saying. I don’t think we should be digging for dirt to go against any of the organizations. All of them are well run by people doing good work. If they weren’t, none of them would still be around. As Professor Campbell said yesterday, his grad student realized there were no bad choices to be made.

    We’ve only been at this for three months. I don’t feel we have the information or breadth of knowledge to meaningfully criticize some of the things we have been. We truly live in the bubble of campus and I feel a bit like Nancy Roob at times.

    Overall, I’m not sure how much we should harp on financial need. On one hand, some may deem the organization the most in need as the one who shall receive funds. Being at a loss is often the result of budget cuts rather than poor allocation of resources. On the other hand, a financially sound organization has ample support for a reason. It is likely a sign that they are addressing a worthy cause well and supporting them is good encouragement to keep up the good work or expand if possible. If we enjoy investing in growing businesses, then the principle should not change with charity. There are reasons to give to charities that are well off and in need and I don’t think either end of the spectrum should be declared more favorable than the other. However, if anyone does want to consider it, it is important to pick a stance and stick with it. Personally, if you made me pick I might say because our money is a relatively small, one-time investment, it may be logical to consider a more financially sound organization for the program grant and an organization in need for the operating one. (1/2)

    ReplyDelete
  2. To finish up my post I would like to simply add to your positive comments on these organizations:)

    While it is true that our money will only help 2 kids for a year at the YWCA, I think Carole Coppens proposed this program to us for a reason. Taking a peek at their 990 shows that the Young Wonders Program takes up roughly 27% of their total expenses! Clearly, this is something they believe in and are seeing success in if they are pouring this much funding into it. I can see how having a fund to help ensure kids don’t have to disenroll is important to help parents continue to work/support their families even when they cross the benefits cliff.

    I think CHOW really does a lot of good work. In addition to what you said, their site visit impressed me because of all the collective action I saw. They work in conjunction with so many businesses, organizations, and farmers to ensure they can collect, distribute and minimize waste of as much food as possible. This is awesome because it keeps perfectly food from going to waste while preventing it from turning into methane (GHG 30x more potent than CO2). Their bus solution is creative and reminds me of social enterprise. Bringing a grocery store to those in food deserts and using the profits to feed the hungry was great. The fact that they have a program that is training people for jobs that will be coming to the area when the Dicks Sporting Goods warehouse is built was awesome too.

    The Boys and Girls Club is probably the organization that serves the most children and the largest age range, so they are really important to the community. Their facility was great (I kind of wanted to stay and hang out lol) but I totally agree that we shouldn’t interpret this to mean they are well off. I recall being told that they weren’t able to raise as much as they wanted and had to shrink the gym and cut out a pool. The fact that it only cost $65 a year is incredible, making it an incredibly economical form of child care after school.
    The MHA was very passionate and that really stuck with me. I could hear it in the way everyone spoke that they felt very strongly about the things they do. The programs they have (beyond Compeer) seem like very positive things. I liked hearing about their expanse into schools in the area. Their services seem to be the thing where a little bit goes a long way.

    WCC also had great prospects. As someone that does from a small town, I really understand Patty’s passion. Though Deposit is a small town that’s seen better days, she loves where she lives and the center she runs is a big part of the community. I think it’s very admirable and the fact that they have a waiting list tells me the need is there and their reputation is a good one. I can still smell the cookies they had baking in the oven when we visited.


    A bad choice cannot be made here, folks. (2/2)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Andrea,
      Although I am not writing a full comment, I just want to say I completely agree! There was no bad decision in regard to our class selection. In fact, learning how to incorporate matters of the ideal and unideal within an organization is a truly useful skill. Thank you Allyson for bringing the two to light; giving us an opportunity to honestly interpret both.

      Delete
  3. Ally and Andrea,

    The factor of "demonstrated need" seems to hold much contention in our class. And I would like to point out that Charity Navigator and BBB's charity assessments do not measure demonstrated need. In fact, the criteria focus on almost the opposite metric--financial health. Perhaps the reason CN and BBB do not include demonstrated need is exactly for the reasons you discussed: every organization "needs" money, and in measuring "need," it is hard to know the difference between good organizations who have merely lost funding and those who are not financially efficient with their funds, or simply don't use their money as effectively as they can. Thus, the factor of demonstrated need is vague, while measuring financial performance demonstrates that an organization can handle donations responsibly--an unambiguously positive characteristic.

    Thus, I believe that financial performance and measuring how "well" an organization does "good" is a clearer and more reliable indicator of which organization deserves our funding.

    Would love to hear others' thoughts about this idea!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Allyson,

    I really do agree with you in saying that certain organizations we were deciding between had some stigmas associated with it, many of which developed in classroom discussion. Over the course of the semester, our class has had to make several decisions that were based completely on the subjective understanding of problems both in Broome County and the rest of the world (with our charity pitches). We knew that we would never be able to perfectly understand which social problems we looked at were in most dire need of a donation, otherwise we should have been able to easily find worthwhile candidates in picking our finalist organizations. I agree that all of our finalist organizations are great candidates but think that you shouldn't overlook financial need too quickly. One of the major keys of this class was to learn how to do good, well. I argued in our last paper that we, as a class, should look at which organizations would allow for our donated dollars to stretch the farthest. We've had readings on this topic and I am convinced that taking a charity's financial need into account is necessary in making the best decision possible, especially since we are working with smaller organizations in our Binghamton community.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.